I’m not sure that I’ve quite said that, but if it suits your argument, then I suppose you can choose to just make stuff up.
What we have on here is the typical polarised political lines being drawn and a whole load of assumptions.
The EU has hardly played the game with regard to the UK exit of Europe and seems more focused on protecting the crumbling empire by mKing an example of the U.K., rather than focusing on its obligations to respect our sovereignty and make this arrangement as painless and reasonable as possible.
The UK entered into agreement with them on the understanding that they would work with us to reach a deal and will have had our own interpretation as to the basis of implementation of any signed agreements.
If , as it appears may be the case, the agreement requires clarification in order to ensure that the EU influence cannot extend beyond that which was envisaged within the spirit of that agreement, then the UK potentially has every right to clarify in specific areas.
Further, given the stage of the negotiations and the lack of progress to date. It makes absolute sense to get this matter on the table now, rather than later.