I have had a moment to think about what I’m permitted to say. I have to say I’ve signed the Official Secrets Act and so must be guarded in what I put out, recognising what is already in the public domain.
My work was to do with the protection of the nation in the event of a nuclear incident. You can decide what sort of threat we may have faced in recent years. The level of resilience now put in place has been designed to protect us against an event that is considered to be lower than a 1 in 10000 year event, but should it happen it would be destructive to the whole of Northern Europe. Contrast this to a pandemic which was assessed to be likely to happen once in a dozen or so years.
The nation has funded the modification to our nuclear installations in advance of threat, created a spine of bases along the length of the country stocked with all the equipment needed (turnkey ready), recruited and trained ex-special forces in the deployment, developed all the protocols needed for an emergency response, and most importantly tested them in live situations.
Now think about how ready we were to track the the first case of covid, how ready our testing regime was to swing into action, what policy decisions were needed, what steps would lockdown the first cases etc etc.
And don’t get me started on the inadequacies of the global authorities to counter what was a global threat that should have been anticipated and nipped early in the bud.
I’m not being critical of the current regime’s response at all. It’s doing reasonably well considering how hamstrung it was when the pandemic emerged. The deaths to date are much lower than they could have been. However, the value on every single life is so great that to deny avoidability is to allow those who shirked the responsibility in years gone by to get away with it. That’s inexcusable.