Pool4eva
Well-known member
Pilley became a director of FTFC in 2004, so not sure if that was whilst he was scamming people, he became a director of Poolfoot in 2019
Pilley gets 13 years
- Thread starter Tangerine Tractor
- Start date
[
It's been done before. It adds a layer of complexity foe the POCA, but it's certainly not an insurmountable hurdle for them.
You'd imagine that region of the world will be happy to cooperate with the UK on subject relating to the supply of energy.
Sorry your pal has been caught, btw.
It's been done before. It adds a layer of complexity foe the POCA, but it's certainly not an insurmountable hurdle for them.
You'd imagine that region of the world will be happy to cooperate with the UK on subject relating to the supply of energy.
Sorry your pal has been caught, btw.
Murciaseasider
Well-known member
If he's defrauded £15 million, then would that be the value of assets seized, or would it be more than that? Also how much is Pilley actually worth? If he's worth (say) £500 million, then is it realistic that FTFC assets would be seized - drop in the ocean compared to the total asset base? FTFC appear to be on the hunt for a new owner and have been liaising with the EFL. If those discussions are progressing, then it looks like the EFL are confident that FTFC will be able to fulfill fixtures in the coming season. Obviously a very complex issue but if I was an FTFC fan (which I'm definitely not), I'd be concerned but probably not overly worried.
TKL_Seasider
Well-known member
My understanding is that the POCA is basically like any other demand for payment; whoever has power of attorney over the assets has at least some control over where the funds come from. So if the demand is £15mn and they have £15mn in cash or liquid assets (shares etc) there’s no drama.
If there isn’t that in cash, as seems likely, you have the option of either borrowing against assets or selling.
Both options involve challenges
Mexboroseasider
Well-known member
Dubai/the UAE is a funny one.
It’s certainly had a reputation for being a magnet for money launderers and the proceeds of crime but there have been a lot of signs recently of more cooperation and a crack down by the authorities over there.
www.thenationalnews.com
It’s certainly had a reputation for being a magnet for money launderers and the proceeds of crime but there have been a lot of signs recently of more cooperation and a crack down by the authorities over there.
UAE extradites 43 on money laundering charges in three years
Financial penalties handed to criminals financing terrorism
www.thenationalnews.com
Mexboroseasider
Well-known member
West wants to look the other way on UAE money laundering
As geopolitical winds shift, the US and European governments turn a blind eye to Emirates’ money laundering problem.
www.politico.eu
This helps put it in context.
Dubai has been told to “get their house in order”.
Whether their attempts are just window dressing is one question. But even if they are, if the NCA turns up with a confiscation order for the assets of a convicted fraudster it seems to me it wouldn’t help Dubai’s case to be anything but cooperative.
AngelBFC
Well-known member
He ll get a maximum period of 6 months to pay it
If he doesn’t they ll proceed to enforcement
Satriale's Pork Store
Well-known member
Can someone remind me what was the banner that the Cods held up at Highbury a few years back when we visited?
Would it be childish to reciprocate?
Would it be childish to reciprocate?
I thought that was his prison uniform
Archibald Knox
Well-known member
There is an argument to say that the £15 million fraudulent profits made by BES might not be the only funds that the authorities will go after with POCA following this criminal trial.
Now that Pilley has been convicted of fraud I would expect HMRC to be crawling all over the books, computers, bank transfer records and tax returns of Pilley, his sister, BES and all the associated shell companies in the U.K. and abroad looking for evidence of false accounting and tax evasion. And that could go on for a decade or longer, HMRC is very tenacious.
Just thought I would add a bit to this.
I see that BES put out a statement distancing themselves from Pilley and the other 3 who were found guilty. That’s fair enough, they have to try and put distance between the company and those named
However over on Trustpilot there are masses of favourable reviews going on that are blatantly fake as fake can be..
It clearly suggests that staff there are still happy to tell lies and that the “new management” are either unable or unwilling to change tactic.
The whole company appears to be as bent as can be and I doubt it will survive.
The fallout from this is going to be widespread and ongoing
I see that BES put out a statement distancing themselves from Pilley and the other 3 who were found guilty. That’s fair enough, they have to try and put distance between the company and those named
However over on Trustpilot there are masses of favourable reviews going on that are blatantly fake as fake can be..
It clearly suggests that staff there are still happy to tell lies and that the “new management” are either unable or unwilling to change tactic.
The whole company appears to be as bent as can be and I doubt it will survive.
The fallout from this is going to be widespread and ongoing
Theoneandonly
Well-known member
What’s weird about Blackpool/Fleetwood is everyone knows who the criminals are and what they are doing and yet so few go to jail. I wonder why that is?
I work in town and I have to say the behaviour of a lot of people is poor. No police on the streets unless they’re called out, it appears you can behave how you want.
bollieboy
Well-known member
1 year of his sentence was for fraud by the means of posting fake reviews. If it is still going on in volume then somebody else is going to get their collar felt.
The fake reviews are so obvious also - 80 % of reviews give 5 star ratings and 20 % give 1 star. Read the 5 star ratings and it is pretty obvious they are written by the same person. The 1 star ratings are obviously written by individuals who have been victims and are raging.
GrahamwantshisOates
Well-known member
Just had a look at Trustpilot. Nearly all reviews are 5 star or 1 star. very few in between which raises suspicion.
I assume employees are part of 5 star reviews!
AngelBFC
Well-known member
Will ofgem not remove its licence as it appears to be used as a vehicle to commit crime ?
Will the EFL allow such a company to continue to sponsor a football club or fund it in anyway ?
These are my questions but they remain unanswered even though verdict was 6 weeks ago .
To preserve the integrity of English football shouldn’t they have acted now ?
They don’t mess about when it comes to deducting points when clubs spend too much or can’t pay the bills. They are in like Flynn.
When a ceo and secretary have a pop at a ref the football authorities put them in front of a tribunal within days
But when a clubs owner and benefactor is done for a serious fraud and in his judgement the judge referred to the fact that his investment in fleetwood which is in the tens of millions btw was tainted they don’t seem to be doing anything
Maybe they are behind the scenes I don’t know but this trial went on for 6 months plus were they not prepared for it ?
And yes I’d be ok with fleetwood town ceasing to exist because in order to get their football fix it’s fans will come to see a proper club BFC
Will the EFL allow such a company to continue to sponsor a football club or fund it in anyway ?
These are my questions but they remain unanswered even though verdict was 6 weeks ago .
To preserve the integrity of English football shouldn’t they have acted now ?
They don’t mess about when it comes to deducting points when clubs spend too much or can’t pay the bills. They are in like Flynn.
When a ceo and secretary have a pop at a ref the football authorities put them in front of a tribunal within days
But when a clubs owner and benefactor is done for a serious fraud and in his judgement the judge referred to the fact that his investment in fleetwood which is in the tens of millions btw was tainted they don’t seem to be doing anything
Maybe they are behind the scenes I don’t know but this trial went on for 6 months plus were they not prepared for it ?
And yes I’d be ok with fleetwood town ceasing to exist because in order to get their football fix it’s fans will come to see a proper club BFC
Seasiderogy
Well-known member
Pocas arm can stretch far and wide
bollieboy
Well-known member
I would suspect things are going on in the background. FTFC will have to convince the EFL that AP has no formal or informal control over the club. FTFC probably thought that removing him from directorship and putting his son in as chairman would suffice. I would hazard that the EFL have called bullshit on this and want further action taken to remove AP's influence (and potential risk from POCA). Personally can't see how this could be realistically achieved without selling the club.
And good luck with finding a buyer for what is essentially a white elephant.
seasiderjohn
Well-known member
changed a few years back its half now
how much time do you serve on a prison sentence UK
how much time do you serve on a prison sentence UK for sentences like 12 years, 7 years, 10 years, 12 years, 25 years, 15 years, 7 years, 6 years and more.
prisonguide.co.uk
and was the sentence concurrent or consecutive 9 years 3 years 1 year but if concurrent then its 9 years meaning out in 4.5 years
Some friends of mine own a small call centre in Preston it does customer care for several other companies.
For over the last 6 or 7 years they have had a blanket policy not to interview any BES, Commercial Power or associated staff. It sounds harsh but it was done because of issues with a few folk who had come from there.
Some of the fake reviews going onto Trustpilot go into quite a lot of detail. astonishing that they tend to name a member of staff who was very helpful/brilliant/ etc. If these staffers think it's going to increase their employment chances elsewhere it's doubtful.
I cannot personally see how BES can continue the whole business must be tainted by this.
Towerpower99
Well-known member
Whatever time Pilley ends up doing I’m sure it will feel like a long long time to him…,changed a few years back its half now
how much time do you serve on a prison sentence UK
how much time do you serve on a prison sentence UK for sentences like 12 years, 7 years, 10 years, 12 years, 25 years, 15 years, 7 years, 6 years and more.
and was the sentence concurrent or consecutive 9 years 3 years 1 year but if concurrent then its 9 years meaning out in 4.5 years
ParkerAteMyKebab
Well-known member
I did a two week residential course from work earlier this year and that seemed like it went on forever .. 9 years isn't worth thinking about! Potentially 3 World Cups!!
B_Side_The_C_Side
Well-known member
The judge said Pilley will serve a minimum of 9 years out of the 13 he was given....so he's in there until 2032
If the POCA doesn't receive the figure they consider is 'money made due to fraud'....they will start adding more time to that 9 years.
OFGEM (should/must/will) pull BES license to re-sell B2B energy?
The big money maker was Pilley's sister who ran the 'Wholesale' part of the business
Agents for BES placed unsuspecting companies on BES's own wholesaler, without the companies knowing the connection
That's where the big bucks came from.
Think how much Roman Abramovich is worth.....he's an energy 'Wholesaler' through Gazprom
If that license is withdrawn....that's the end of BES, unless it re-brands, moves away from Fleetwood and has 'some' customers left to keep going?
Then once that's done.....You will have a few thousand ex-customers of BES going after compensation.....It's only just started!!!!
If the POCA doesn't receive the figure they consider is 'money made due to fraud'....they will start adding more time to that 9 years.
OFGEM (should/must/will) pull BES license to re-sell B2B energy?
The big money maker was Pilley's sister who ran the 'Wholesale' part of the business
Agents for BES placed unsuspecting companies on BES's own wholesaler, without the companies knowing the connection
That's where the big bucks came from.
Think how much Roman Abramovich is worth.....he's an energy 'Wholesaler' through Gazprom
If that license is withdrawn....that's the end of BES, unless it re-brands, moves away from Fleetwood and has 'some' customers left to keep going?
Then once that's done.....You will have a few thousand ex-customers of BES going after compensation.....It's only just started!!!!
seasiderjohn
Well-known member
changed a few years back its half now
how much time do you serve on a prison sentence UK
how much time do you serve on a prison sentence UK for sentences like 12 years, 7 years, 10 years, 12 years, 25 years, 15 years, 7 years, 6 years and more.
so the judge said 9 years which means its concurrent so he will serve 9 years 4.5 in prison and the remaining 4.5 on licence less double the time he spent on remand
AngelBFC
Well-known member
Did he B Side ?
I haven't read that anywhere and the Judge doesn't have the power to order a minimum term he must serve in prison in respect of a determinate sentence.
seasiderjohn
Well-known member
sounds like the judge has said he will serve 9 years as the sentences are to run concurrent
the press always add all the sentences to make it sound more
Blackpool_Gaz
Well-known member
Which prison will Pilley be a guest at first?
He'll probably end up at Kirkham open prison after four or five years.
Grinning criminals boast jail is 'Butlins behind bars'
He'll probably end up at Kirkham open prison after four or five years.
Grinning criminals boast jail is 'Butlins behind bars'
Wizaard
Well-known member
So it's a dirty shithole then?Which prison will Pilley be a guest at first?
He'll probably end up at Kirkham open prison after four or five years.
Grinning criminals boast jail is 'Butlins behind bars'
AngelBFC
Well-known member
Im astounded John at the poor quality of the reporting on this case bearing in mind his infamy on the fylde coast .
Why cant they just tell us if the sentences were concurrent or consecutive ? Basic stuff !!!
My understanding was these were consecutive
April13th1970
Well-known member
I doubt he'll go to Kirkham as that's a category D (i.e. Open) Prison and I'd expect that initially he'd be in, at least, a category D prison, so more likely to be Wymott, Lancaster Farms or HaveriggWhich prison will Pilley be a guest at first?
He'll probably end up at Kirkham open prison after four or five years.
Grinning criminals boast jail is 'Butlins behind bars'
Prison Categories
seasiderjohn
Well-known member
yes i agree I'm only guessing at concurrent as if the judge said serve 9 years then that would mean concurrent
seasiderjohn
Well-known member
would imagine wymott or haverigg as they are cat C
seasideone
Well-known member
The transcript from the sentencing will be available somewhere - anyone know where?
AngelBFC
Well-known member
Think you have to apply for it and judge has to give specific permission.
AngelBFC
Well-known member
I don’t know where this 9 years has come from it’s not reported anywhere
In the meantime I’ve been told by someone non AVTT and is reliable that it was consec
So 13 serves half
Matesrates
Well-known member
Seems they’re confident they’re going to continue as normal
The Judge’s remarks from earlier in the thread:
- As you come to be sentenced you tell me through counsel that you feel humiliated and your prison cell is small.
- You fight everything and everybody who is against you with your wealth. You are highly litigious.
- Lee Qualter, you agreed to Pilley’s sham arrangements. You were, you said, a puppet and a stooge.
- Pilley had a client list he referred to as 'the bent selling list'
- Chapman sent Pilley an email saying “You reject my advice because you are crooked. I need to get out or I will be tainted more than I am already”
- Michelle felt disrespected by her brother Pilley
Here is what Judge Knowles said to each defendant as he sentenced them:
In 1998 you went to prison for four months for conspiracy to steal from the post office where you were a counter clerk.
Yours could have been a remarkable story of redemption, success, local heroism and philanthropy. Instead it is a sordid tale of squalid lies, greed and fraud.
You told brazen lies to the jury. When confronted with your own words typed with your own hands you complained ludicrously of trial by email.
Missing from your evidence was any conventional sense of honesty. You endlessly repeated, “I detest mis-sell,” but the reason you gave was never that customers should not be cheated, nor that salespeople should be truthful. It was only ever that it was a danger to your business.
On your first visit to this court, your counsel’s first words were to ask that you should not have to sit in the dock. I refused it on the basis that all defendants are treated equally here. Now as you come to be sentenced you tell me through counsel that you feel humiliated and your prison cell is small.
Here in court you are not special. You are a criminal. You are a fraudster.
You share many traits, many of them unattractive, with other successful fraudsters.
You are a hypocrite who will not tolerate criticism. When the BBC told the truth about you and your crooked businesses you launched a formal complaint.
You fight everything and everybody who is against you with your wealth. You are highly litigious. There are many examples. I shall give only two. You threatened to sue the Mayburys.
You sued the local authority which prosecutes this case in the High Court, alleging misfeasance in public office, unlawful obtaining of search warrants, particularly by an allegedly unfair presentation of the application, trespass and conversion: BES Commercial Electricity Ltd and others v Cheshire West and Chester Council [2022] EWHC 2162 (QB).
You were entitled to contest the case and to do so in those ways and before the jury and entitled to bring the civil proceedings and none of that inflates your sentence. But it gives an insight into you and it fits with everything I observed of you before you gave evidence, during your evidence, and afterwards.
You called character witnesses. One said you “took round PlayStations as Christmas presents to children – nobody knew” and provided meals to needy families.
Your counsel elicited from your witness that unlike others, “he doesn’t tell anybody – I’ve never heard him brag or boast about anything that he’s given”.
I think that adducing that evidence caused you little mortification.
There is though no doubt that the money you have given has done great good in Fleetwood. Fleetwood has suffered a terrible decline through no fault of its people, and your investment, for instance at Poolfoot, has been transformational for people of all ages and backgrounds. But now everyone must reckon with the painful truth that much of your wealth came from crime.
I have no reason to think that your only motive for doing good in Fleetwood was to court admiration, but given the huge profits you have made from your crimes it is difficult to regard what you did there as significant mitigation.
I also bear in mind that whilst your businesses have given jobs to many, those which featured in this case are now tainted by crime, and the corrupt culture has tainted many of the young and impressionable sales people who were recruited.
You are said to be a good friend, a good son and a good father and grandfather and it is no doubt true. Your eldest son speaks of his distress that you will be absent when his second child is born and of much else in his measured letter. Your 18 year-old daughter similarly writes a letter which I have read several times. She gives an overview, with remarkable maturity, of the impact on your family of your going to jail. She says, “I am not trying to challenge or question anything, this is just a letter from the heart of a girl who misses her dad...Please consider this: we are a family with real feelings and real problems”.
As an eminent judge once said in a case on the topic,crime turns lives upside down. Your daughter says much the same later in her letter. I take your family into account, but it can only be to a very limited extent....
I accept that BES was not fraudulent from its beginnings but that is of little account because the sham companies were and BES’s trading throughout the whole indictment period was.
It is inevitable that some telesales staff on commission will lie. The employer’s remedy is to sack them when they are caught. There is no use in having an elaborate system for monitoring lying if, as in your businesses, there are no real adverse consequences.
You operated a reverse system. The best liars were promoted. When as in a couple of exceptional instances people were sacked the sacking was illusory because they just
moved to new jobs in your other areas of business.
You ran the businesses fraudulently, entirely deliberately. You adopted the lies that were told and tacitly encouraged them.
As the journalist from the BBC found, everybody knew the difference between the paperwork and the reality.
There were at least three purposes to your compliance department. The main one was
to make sure that the staff used your sales techniques – an improvement on simply having a floorwalker listening in. Another was to lend credence to your claims that BES was a clean business – window-dressing, in other words. A third was to enable you to calibrate the extent and nature of the fraud so that you as an entrepreneur could make the call of risk against reward on the best information.
The compliance department cost you money, but the question is whether there was a net gain and I am sure you considered that there was.
There was legitimate trading too. That again was part of the balance you struck.
You were the author of the fast track scheme.
You deliberately had your staff deceive customers, the Ombudsman and Ofgem and you yourself deceived Ofgem on a grand scale as to the whole nature of your relationship to the sham companies and as to the call recordings, all whilst posing as a champion of plain dealing and enemy of fraud. Even your top-up of the Ofgem fine is likely to have been
- As you come to be sentenced you tell me through counsel that you feel humiliated and your prison cell is small.
- You fight everything and everybody who is against you with your wealth. You are highly litigious.
- Lee Qualter, you agreed to Pilley’s sham arrangements. You were, you said, a puppet and a stooge.
- Pilley had a client list he referred to as 'the bent selling list'
- Chapman sent Pilley an email saying “You reject my advice because you are crooked. I need to get out or I will be tainted more than I am already”
- Michelle felt disrespected by her brother Pilley
Here is what Judge Knowles said to each defendant as he sentenced them:
Andrew Pilley - Asked whether he needed to sit in the dock
Andrew James Pilley, the removal to prison of your loyal employee, your sometime best friend and your own sister is your doing as well as theirs.In 1998 you went to prison for four months for conspiracy to steal from the post office where you were a counter clerk.
Yours could have been a remarkable story of redemption, success, local heroism and philanthropy. Instead it is a sordid tale of squalid lies, greed and fraud.
You told brazen lies to the jury. When confronted with your own words typed with your own hands you complained ludicrously of trial by email.
Missing from your evidence was any conventional sense of honesty. You endlessly repeated, “I detest mis-sell,” but the reason you gave was never that customers should not be cheated, nor that salespeople should be truthful. It was only ever that it was a danger to your business.
On your first visit to this court, your counsel’s first words were to ask that you should not have to sit in the dock. I refused it on the basis that all defendants are treated equally here. Now as you come to be sentenced you tell me through counsel that you feel humiliated and your prison cell is small.
Here in court you are not special. You are a criminal. You are a fraudster.
You share many traits, many of them unattractive, with other successful fraudsters.
You are a hypocrite who will not tolerate criticism. When the BBC told the truth about you and your crooked businesses you launched a formal complaint.
You fight everything and everybody who is against you with your wealth. You are highly litigious. There are many examples. I shall give only two. You threatened to sue the Mayburys.
You sued the local authority which prosecutes this case in the High Court, alleging misfeasance in public office, unlawful obtaining of search warrants, particularly by an allegedly unfair presentation of the application, trespass and conversion: BES Commercial Electricity Ltd and others v Cheshire West and Chester Council [2022] EWHC 2162 (QB).
You were entitled to contest the case and to do so in those ways and before the jury and entitled to bring the civil proceedings and none of that inflates your sentence. But it gives an insight into you and it fits with everything I observed of you before you gave evidence, during your evidence, and afterwards.
You called character witnesses. One said you “took round PlayStations as Christmas presents to children – nobody knew” and provided meals to needy families.
Your counsel elicited from your witness that unlike others, “he doesn’t tell anybody – I’ve never heard him brag or boast about anything that he’s given”.
I think that adducing that evidence caused you little mortification.
There is though no doubt that the money you have given has done great good in Fleetwood. Fleetwood has suffered a terrible decline through no fault of its people, and your investment, for instance at Poolfoot, has been transformational for people of all ages and backgrounds. But now everyone must reckon with the painful truth that much of your wealth came from crime.
I have no reason to think that your only motive for doing good in Fleetwood was to court admiration, but given the huge profits you have made from your crimes it is difficult to regard what you did there as significant mitigation.
I also bear in mind that whilst your businesses have given jobs to many, those which featured in this case are now tainted by crime, and the corrupt culture has tainted many of the young and impressionable sales people who were recruited.
You are said to be a good friend, a good son and a good father and grandfather and it is no doubt true. Your eldest son speaks of his distress that you will be absent when his second child is born and of much else in his measured letter. Your 18 year-old daughter similarly writes a letter which I have read several times. She gives an overview, with remarkable maturity, of the impact on your family of your going to jail. She says, “I am not trying to challenge or question anything, this is just a letter from the heart of a girl who misses her dad...Please consider this: we are a family with real feelings and real problems”.
As an eminent judge once said in a case on the topic,crime turns lives upside down. Your daughter says much the same later in her letter. I take your family into account, but it can only be to a very limited extent....
I accept that BES was not fraudulent from its beginnings but that is of little account because the sham companies were and BES’s trading throughout the whole indictment period was.
It is inevitable that some telesales staff on commission will lie. The employer’s remedy is to sack them when they are caught. There is no use in having an elaborate system for monitoring lying if, as in your businesses, there are no real adverse consequences.
You operated a reverse system. The best liars were promoted. When as in a couple of exceptional instances people were sacked the sacking was illusory because they just
moved to new jobs in your other areas of business.
You ran the businesses fraudulently, entirely deliberately. You adopted the lies that were told and tacitly encouraged them.
As the journalist from the BBC found, everybody knew the difference between the paperwork and the reality.
There were at least three purposes to your compliance department. The main one was
to make sure that the staff used your sales techniques – an improvement on simply having a floorwalker listening in. Another was to lend credence to your claims that BES was a clean business – window-dressing, in other words. A third was to enable you to calibrate the extent and nature of the fraud so that you as an entrepreneur could make the call of risk against reward on the best information.
The compliance department cost you money, but the question is whether there was a net gain and I am sure you considered that there was.
There was legitimate trading too. That again was part of the balance you struck.
You were the author of the fast track scheme.
You deliberately had your staff deceive customers, the Ombudsman and Ofgem and you yourself deceived Ofgem on a grand scale as to the whole nature of your relationship to the sham companies and as to the call recordings, all whilst posing as a champion of plain dealing and enemy of fraud. Even your top-up of the Ofgem fine is likely to have been
NewburyOne
Well-known member
Brown extends his contract to 2025, is this just to portray an illusion all is OK?
B_Side_The_C_Side
Well-known member
For some reason I had it in my head that he would 'serve' 9 years 
I'm sure I read it in the reporting, but I stand to be corrected
I would go looking for it, but my own legal necessities have just come calling, so I need to find a decent solicitor as well ASAP......
I'm sure I read it in the reporting, but I stand to be corrected
I would go looking for it, but my own legal necessities have just come calling, so I need to find a decent solicitor as well ASAP......
seasiderjohn
Well-known member
parole eligability date 18/11/2029
seasiderjohn
Well-known member
parole eligability date 188/11/2029
seasideone
Well-known member
That answers that then - 6.5 years min
Wizaard
Well-known member
Or they'll get more of a payout when he leaves.
seasiderjohn
Well-known member
less 10 weeks for the 5 on remand
Towerpower99
Well-known member
That’s only if he behaves….
Seainsea
Well-known member
Goes to show there are no scruples in football. I find it unbelievable (maybe I shouldn't) that the EFL appear to be just standing by and allowing Fleetwood to continue on a "business as usual" basis. You would have thought they would be investigating very closely who owns the club and how it is being funded? The owner of the club has been found guilty of being a major fraudster and Fleetwood have just changed the names on the doors.