It's not rubbish at all. It is in the British Medical Journal. People need to read up on these articles below and see why there is such concern -
On 30 December the four UK chief medical officers announced that the second doses of the covid vaccines should be given towards the end of 12 weeks rather than in the previously recommended 3-4 weeks. Gareth Iacobucci and Elisabeth Mahase look at the questions this has raised In a letter sent...
www.bmj.com
The gradual rollout of the Pfizer and Moderna mRNA vaccines and the likelihood of additional approvals in the coming months provide hope for bringing the covid-19 pandemic under control in [...]More...
blogs.bmj.com
The importance of successful vaccination strategies in controlling the covid-19 pandemic cannot be overstated and should be vigorously endorsed. Equally critical is that vaccines’ proven to be effective in a [...]More...
blogs.bmj.com
Pfizer are clear, this is a new kind of vaccine that has never been tested in the way the British government is now deciding to administer it. The decision made by the British is based on
assumption, not evidence. This new kind of vaccine wears off quickly after the first jab (unlike the OxfordAstraZeneca one). Here is an extract:
" virus neutralising antibody production fall off markedly (suggesting limited survival and stimulation by the vaccine mRNA and its’ encoded Spike immunogen). However, the specific anti-viral immune response was strongly boosted with a 2nd injection of vaccine. [6] This raises concerns that extending a 2nd injection out to beyond 28 days could compromise vaccine efficacy."
This is why Pfizer are adamant that the second jab needs to be between 3 and 4 weeks after the first.
We could end up in a situation where millions of expensive initial vaccine doses end up being rended useless and those people needing to have two more administered (as per the manufacturers instructions and how it was tested).