Well it wasn’t me
.Either civil servants, or one or more of the Bishops in the House of Lords, who appear to block any attempts to sort the illegal immigration problem out.
True Sven but an example is roaming our streets at the moment (but more likely hidden by a friend etc) who threw a corrosive substance over a woman and her children, and who is a convicted sex offender but decided to convert to Christianity to save being deported.
I know. That’s what I disagree with. I don’t think religion should be a deciding factor to whether people are granted asylum as it’s so easy to manipulate.
I agree with you there Spud.
I can't believe it is, given that the vast majority of people born and bred here aren't exactly flocking to church services.
There is a wide gap between integrating into our society by converting to Christianity, and using Christianity as a tool to take advantage of an asylum situation.
A motivation for doing this amongst asylum seekers is that apostates (converts from Islam to other religions) are outcasts in their own society. And in some more extreme regimes can be murdered in line with an extreme version of Islam. This can obviously help with an asylum application.
You're preaching to someone who lives in a very diverse society. I have good friends and acquaintances in various faiths and with different political outlooks. The area I live in has Asian Muslims & Hindus, Nigerians and various other Black African and Carribeans, Thai's, Ukranians, Poles and of course us indigenous individuals. We have a vibrant society in which most mix, a neighbourhood watch which reports any illegal goings on such as drug drops. Those who keep themselves to themselves are welcome to do so, but we all pull together when required.
And he’s a proper wet wipe who should keep his nose out of politics!
There’s a big difference between legal and illegal Immigrants and the latter should be deported back to where they come from whether they want a better life or not.
The school selection process is the only area of public life (that I know of) where it is legal to discriminate against people who want to use state provided services on a particular characteristic (religious belief). I can't believe that this will be allowed for too much longer.
Don't let the facts get in the way of an opinion piece off GB News.
Most people, even on the left, can see it's taking the piss out of us in this area.
I am sure this is made up bollocks. It would make no difference to the assessment of a claim, even if it were happening. I also noticed that you decided that they were "illegal" in the space of two sentences.
We could do with these fanatical Islamic leaders in Iran/Iraq/Syria converting to Christianity the world would be a much safer place.
So are they not illegally entering this country then? Please tell us more? as you seem to know more on the subject than Rishi Sunak and his Government lawyers.
As far as I'm aware, seeking asylum is not in itself an offence. Quite the opposite, in fact. I'm also of the view that in this country we normally give people a fair hearing before deciding they are guilty of anything, which is also consistent with our obligations under International law.
Seeking asylum isn’t an offence and I never said it was.
It isn't if you apply for asylum, although Rishi and co would like you to think it is.
How can you apply for asylum without any documentation (passport etc) of who you are and proof of where you’ve actually come from?
How can you apply for asylum without any documentation (passport etc) of who you are and proof of where you’ve actually come from?
That’s the problem we’re seeing right now terrorist’s, sex gangs, sex traffickers, crime gangs, can all enter Willy nilly that being the case and many are today as we’re seeing.
Are the Government so wrong for trying to protect us our children and our children's children?
I for one think not so get my vote.
Under normal circumstances I’d laugh at that picture sadly it’s all too true today.
How can you seek asylum from us if there is deliberately no legal route getting here?
As you well know I’ve slagged the government off many times on here for spending millions on this illegal immigration Malarky.
Actually agree with most of that. What I hope the be Givernment of whatever politics do is solve this by proper management. Processing centre in Northern France, beef up civil servants dealing with asylum seekers in the UK, get the NCA to go after the smuggler gangs in cooperation with the French and Interpol. The irony is it can be fixed in a couple of years, at lower cost than the massive £5 billion spent on that floating prison
Yes, but that doesn't provide a scapegoat. Everything would be fine if it wasn't for those pesky foreigners clogging up the NHS, taking all the jobs and claiming all the benefits.
To be frank, I would outlaw all schools who select pupils on the basis of religion and make the state education system totally secular. Never mind the hundreds of years of religious tradition. Leave religion to the home and places of worship.
The EU border is still the same distance away and they still have to travel through safe countries and get to the UK, which would happen regardless of whether we're in a political union or not. The French have no incentive to sort this in or out.
