Hockaday’s Quiff
Well-known member
The ref didn’t look like he was going to send their fella off. Seemed the lino intervening later?
They're just motoring through things that have already happened to fulfil a contractual obligation I think. Not much time for the rent-a-pundit to have his own thoughts either way.ITV4 pundits think it was a red.
Not really clumsy, I thought well executedWas a clumsy foul, but never a red.
Yeah we'll just have to see. I'm guessing it costs to appeal so you need a heads up you might win first.Having seen it again on ITV4, it didnt look anything like he was "taking one for the team"
The Burnley player was well in his own half, and there were other Blackpool defenders in front of him.
It wasnt anything like the `one-on-one' Thompson incident against Swansea last week, that led to their goal.
And this is coming from me, who was lambasting the referee for sending him off earlier.
Put it this way...I'd be surprised if we appeal.
Let's wait and see.
The Clampet was definitely a straight red though.
They wont be appealing..LOL
Good point actually. Would have forgot to say but for this post. Radio Lancs commentary was excellent. Weller too, tbf.All the radio lancs commentators (including the ex Burnley player) were amazed that Carey received a red.
They all agreed the Burnley Hot Head deserved his though.
The referee bottled it and it even looked for a while he might not send the Burnley player off.
KnobSorry, but it was serious foul play and justified the sending off. No intention of playing the ball.
The ITV host knows nothing about football.ITV4 pundits think it was a red.
Yep, and possibly cost us the gameYellow in any other game with any other ref!
Had another look this morning just in case the sangria did get the better of me, as some on here have suggested. Doesn't get any better I'm afraid. Maybe and just maybe he might have got away with a yellow if the Burnley player hadn't reacted. Nevertheless it was a crude and cynical challenge and its difficult to see where the club go from here. We are now down to the bare bones in midfield. Do the club delve into the market again and if they do, what does that do for the overall balance of the squad when players do become available again. If they stick with what we now have what could that mean for results over the next few weeks? Sorry but what was initially bad luck is now a problem of our own making.Stop it. Never a red, he only got that because Maatsen retaliated. Yellow at best. But we do need a signing now.
Well done, you’re in a minority of just you thinking that’s a red cardHad another look this morning just in case the sangria did get the better of me, as some on here have suggested. Doesn't get any better I'm afraid. Maybe and just maybe he might have got away with a yellow if the Burnley player hadn't reacted. Nevertheless it was a crude and cynical challenge and its difficult to see where the club go from here. We are now down to the bare bones in midfield. Do the club delve into the market again and if they do, what does that do for the overall balance of the squad when players do become available again. If they stick with what we now have what could that mean for results over the next few weeks? Sorry but what was initially bad luck is now a problem of our own making.
You’re a bit mental aren’t you TommyJust watched it back again. Carey made no attempt to play the ball at all. Both sendings off fully justified.
They were totally inconsistent when talking about the Norwich game and the dispossession leading to the second goal. All they said was that the refs instruction this season is to be more lenient.ITV4 pundits think it was a red.
Of course that’s the appeal.Serious foul play is deliberately vague. It covers cynical, unsporting fouls which don't come under the violent conduct category. You could argue this foul was cynical and late. The referee obviously thought so and I'm afraid his opinion will be the one that matters and I think the chances of winning an appeal are very slim. What would our grounds for appeal be? This isn't a case of mistaken identity. We wouldn't say that there wasn't any contact or that the referee didn't see the incident properly. Our case would be that we thought the decision was harsh. That isn't really grounds for an appeal.
Sky have produced a still of the incident. Carey isn’t within a yard and a half of the ball. It doesn’t have to be a goal scoring opportunity. It’s serious foul play - a sending off. It’s true that others might have got away with a yellow in other games but on this occasion the Referee got it right.Knob
The multiple similar offences isn't an argument as individual referees have a degree of latitude when it comes to interpreting the laws. Serious foul play is an example of this. A different referee might have given a yellow and class the tackle as a reckless challenge but the referee yesterday chose to give a red presumably as he saw the tackle as serious foul play.I’d be amazed if we didn’t appeal the red, with video evidence of multiple similar offences that received a yellow. If we did appeal, it’d be a brace panel to uphold the decision, because it would set a precedent counter to the rules of the game.
Are you taking acid?Should be fined by the Club. Has worsened an already dire situation in midfield. Discuss.
It was a trip, the ref would struggle to justify serious fouls play. Had the lad not reacted, it would have been a yellow. This decision is so out of line that it has to be appealed. Bans will only be increased if the appeal is vexatious.The multiple similar offences isn't an argument as individual referees have a degree of latitude when it comes to interpreting the laws. Serious foul play is an example of this. A different referee might have given a yellow and class the tackle as a reckless challenge but the referee yesterday chose to give a red presumably as he saw the tackle as serious foul play.
Appeals have to show a clear and obvious error was made in the application of the law. I don't think we'd be able to do this, although I hope I'm wrong. It's worth remembering though to stop clubs appealing every red card suspensions can be increased if the appeal fails. We certainly don't want to put ourselves in that position.
What the law actually states:How anybody could argue that that was a justified straight red is beyond me. The arguments put forward to support it are not based on the laws of the game.
When I first saw it I honestly did not even think it was a yellow, but looking back at it it probably just about was but not within a country mile of a Red
As Mosser said, it’s highly likely cost us at least a very good chance of winning the game as we were on top at that stage even when it was 11 V 11
The unexpected red for us seem to galvanise their team and we were hanging in at the end
I honestly have no idea how high or low the bar is for appealing red cards but it’s certainly something I’m sure will look at
Sorry, but it was serious foul play and justified the sending off. No intention of playing the ball.
IdiotShould be fined by the Club. Has worsened an already dire situation in midfield. Discuss.
Great point about that Chiellini Saka incident in the Euro final. It isn't a red card offence, it's a yellow card offence. Neither anywhere near the ball, both deliberately stopping the player getting away, but crucially neither was anywhere near being the last defender.When I first saw it, I thought it was a straight red. No attempt was made for the ball, he stretched to purposefully catch the player and I was glad he did.
Their player made it an easy / soft decision for the ref really.
However, when Chiellini cynically clotheslined Saka in the Euro Final, the commentators were virtually creaming their pants about his ‘experience and guile’ and a red was never under consideration…. Carey’s challenge was no worse.