Search results

Some good insight on this thread. But, pray, do tell me, is it a problem for BFC, indirectly of course?

Clever clogs. Grrrrrr

Yeah, I know what you mean, but the 'model' is you keep your best players as much as you can realistically and replace the inferior ones with better, so you improve year on year. You can't keep replacing your best players as they leave, loans this year for us. It means you start from a low...

Don't disagree with that. My point is the best ones don't arrive until late, once the parent club has done it's business. This could impact on the start we make. As I say, our 4 best players that would have finished the season were all loans. You wouldn't want to start with 4 gooduns missing for...

You have to be a complete sad, thick bastard to pick a username like them* has. * proof if required.

A problem we will have is the loan market. We all know PL/Cship clubs wait to see what their business does before deciding who to let go out. Given we really should have finished the season with our best 4 players all being loans (Rhodes would have played). I can't see influential loans coming...

We would have sold him in not time for £10K profit. A profit I suppose unlike recent dealing bar Yates and Bowler.

Thought it was autumn tbh,

I agree, but not with the jump up. Brest won't progress very far and at the level they'll play they'll face some poor teams. I don't know much about Brest and where they'll finish, but in a perverse way it might be better to finish in the lower cup position and play all the games, rather than...

Exactly. You can't keep re-building.

Juve and someone. A move to Germany never came off (Dortmund??Can't remember) last summer.

I reckon we can forget JR now.

Lets all unite and celebrate that it won't be Liverpool 😂

Perfect fit. Him LWB and JordyG and Lyons on the RWB/RM/RW would be amazing. That's the way I'd go.

We were in the Champions league and allsorts.

He would have played 637 times had he been selected.

Phooey're would get that.

Once the PP's are granted there will be more chance of movement, not before.

Sounds a bit costcutting to me. Assuming the TG doesn't open for 3 years what happens to the kids coming through?

The questions you raise are the exact reason why there won't be an open forum in the near future.