Fixed, I’m such a pleb at times.Highest since June I presume you mean.
163k tests, not many, if any, more than the start of June. So this is a sadly a significant increase.We are doing a lot more tests so bound to be higher but agreed still frightening
amounts of new cases , only 8 deaths recorded though
Hospital admissions - Down.
Daily deaths - Down.
These two are the key. It's kinda obvious this virus is around and in more people than we think.
Also people are being tested because of test and trace who are asymptomatic. These cases would not have previously been tested and would not therefore have shown up in any stats. I read somewhere that around half the recent positive tests were asymptomaticPeople that have symptons now, can easily go and get tested. Hence more cases are being shown as positive.
This wasn't the case before.
The figures that are really important are those being admitted to hospital and those dying of the virus.
And those 2 figures are thankfully, diminishing.
Well, they've been lagging for absolute weeks/months. SO I guess watch this space. But bar a few extra hundred cases due to extra testing. Doesn't actually look like a second spike is coming.Lagging indicators.
Load of bollocks. Nobody wants a second spike but to avoid one then action needs to be taken as soon as cases rise. The ONS survey indicates that cases have been rising and daily data is indicating the same. Crush outbreaks now and avoid a second spike - the lesson from earlier in the year is act fast and decisively before you lose control.Well, they've been lagging for absolute weeks/months. SO I guess watch this space. But bar a few extra hundred cases due to extra testing. Doesn't actually look like a second spike is coming.
The second spike that some people want and the media want will come if it comes. The fact I've had to type that sentence shows what a shithouse country we live in at the moment.
It's not a load of bollocks at all. It's pretty clear we're in a world where the media have been loving this situation. The over negative reporting. The absolutely and massively inaccurate reporting. People have been saying there would be a second spike after re-opening the beaches etc. Nope there wasn't.Load of bollocks. Nobody wants a second spike but to avoid one then action needs to be taken as soon as cases rise. The ONS survey indicates that cases have been rising and daily data is indicating the same. Crush outbreaks now and avoid a second spike - the lesson from earlier in the year is act fast and decisively before you lose control.
Absolute bollocks Kurt.It's not a load of bollocks at all. It's pretty clear we're in a world where the media have been loving this situation. The over negative reporting. The absolutely and massively inaccurate reporting. People have been saying there would be a second spike after re-opening the beaches etc. Nope there wasn't.
People just want to say I told you so. So you can take the load of bollocks comment and shove it.
Good for you. If I went around writing what a load of bollocks on your posts. I'd be here all day.Absolute bollocks Kurt.
But anyway, I'll leave you and your bullshit posts to your day. Enjoy.Absolute bollocks Kurt.
Kurt is spot on... The media can't get enough of this.... They we're on the "Second Spike" bandwagon the moment the virus looked like it had turned in our favour. There's a constant stream of Covid 19 related clickbate on the internet from all the mainstream media sources.Absolute bollocks Kurt.
Round our way, no symptoms, no test.Also people are being tested because of test and trace who are asymptomatic. These cases would not have previously been tested and would not therefore have shown up in any stats. I read somewhere that around half the recent positive tests were asymptomatic
So the written press for example, who suffered massive losses in lock down, want another spike so that they can make more losses but have the satisfaction of saying 'we told you so' ?Kurt is spot on... The media can't get enough of this.... They we're on the "Second Spike" bandwagon the moment the virus looked like it had turned in our favour. There's a constant stream of Covid 19 related clickbate on the internet from all the mainstream media sources.
So the written press for example, who suffered massive losses in lock down, want another spike so that they can make more losses but have the satisfaction of saying 'we told you so' ?
Yep, makes sense to me.
Clearly there’s still a significant number that don’t get it, and probably won’t until they get it!
Get it?
I don't know whether they want a second spike, but they have certainly gone out of their way to create the impression that a second spike / wave is inevitable...It's not!!
Well you said Kurt (see quote below) was spot on so seemed to me that you were agreeing that that is what the media want. The second spike/wave should not occur if the right actions are taken. If they aren't then it will happen though you may not agree with that.I don't know whether they want a second spike, but they have certainly gone out of their way to create the impression that a second spike / wave is inevitable...It's not!!
Well I certainly don't mean a reimergence within the community of a virus that has been suppressed. Clearly a "Second Wave" needs to reflect the historical context and appropriate scientific criteria, rather than simply being the media choice of phrase? I mean if we are drawing comparisons with the Spanish Flu, then at least our chosen terminology ought to be accurate, rather than totally misleading?I suppose that it depends what you mean by a second spike but here are a few questions for you.
Do you accept that the daily number of cases is currently rising?
What do you think the outcome of rising case numbers will be,?
Why do you think govenrment are briefing about second wave / spike?
More overhyped fear porn!!Although not many going into hospital the long term effects of carrying COVID-19 are quite serious. The heart, lungs and intestines have all been found to have suffered and there’s also been reports of a rise in sepsis cases due to catching this virus.
I suspect a lot of the youngsters catching this now will be dead or seriously ill before they reach 50. A price you pay for being a dumbass I suppose.
COVID-19 long term effects
I think you can be forgiven for thinking that the media and others want a second spike, given the constant references to it at every pssoible juncture.Well you said Kurt (see quote below) was spot on so seemed to me that you were agreeing that that is what the media want. The second spike/wave should not occur if the right actions are taken. If they aren't then it will happen though you may not agree with that.
'The second spike that some people want and the media want will come if it comes '
The schools v pubs debate is a complete nonsense, given that local lockdowns have been introduced in response to spikes caused by domestic contact and lack of social distancing between families and friends. Pubs have not been the cause. Arguably, the risk is with schools, as kids won't social distance and then go home and infect the vulnerable members of the family.Well I certainly don't mean a reimergence within the community of a virus that has been suppressed. Clearly a "Second Wave" needs to reflect the historical context and appropriate scientific criteria, rather than simply being the media choice of phrase? I mean if we are drawing comparisons with the Spanish Flu, then at least our chosen terminology ought to be accurate, rather than totally misleading?
1. I accept that the published number of confirmed positive cases is rising. I am inclined to believe that means that there is some increase in the number of infections, but that is by no means certain. It is possible that the rising number of cases could be due to more expansive testing. I note that the C19 app, which surveys a signifcant number of individuals in the UK appears to show no increase in predicted case numbers (for example).
2. I've no idea what the outcome will be... It's possible that the numbers will peter out and return to normal, possible that control measures may control the numbers, possible that the numbers are misleading and possible that the numbers may start to rise progressively. Beyond that, I'm not sure how it will impact the population...It's possible there might be a rising number of deaths or not.
3. I think the Government are influenced by scientists and I think that scientists like to create theories. Scientific theories can have wide ranging outcomes and some of them are extremely scarey, whilst others are not very scarey at all. I'm not sure what the overriding motivation of the Government and others is at this point in time....The whole "Schools vs Pubs" narrative is all very interesting as is the potential solution.....It's possible the Government feel they have pushed too fast too soon and are looking for a back door, but there are other possibilities of course.
BFCx3 still in denial. You should just continue being a sheep and flock off.
After suffering through this virus I would never wish this on anybody, even the ones that test my patience!
You are a clown"After Suffering through this virus"
Whilst I'm sure that the virus is horrible for some and I wish you well in your recovery, I'm not sure it qualifies you as an expert. From what I have witnessed on here you seem to fit into the 'hysterical' category in terms of your response and to that extent you aren't exactly adopting a particularly balanced or rational approach. I appreciate that it's possible that your own personal negative experience might have cloured your judgement and that is understandable.
I'm not sure that your experience can explain the rather strange way that you conduct yourself in your interactions on here though. I suspect that has more to do with your personality perhaps.
As it would seem is anyone who doesn't share your rather warped perspective on so many things...You are a clown
Yes I think we have to hang on to the thought that it is a result of increasing testing for now.
It does not appear to be translating into more hospitalised cases and deaths so far. I think that was the case in Leicester anyway .
Warped no, I’m just quoting published stats and asking people to stay safe. If that’s warped then I’m at a loss to think about your perspective.As it would seem is anyone who doesn't share your rather warped perspective on so many things...
There's a number of potential reasons for the increases in cases, which obviously would include the impact of reversing lock-down measures, but it's certainly not as simple as comparing the number of people tested.Positive cases up 17 %, number of people tested up 4 %.
Hope you are correct that increases are due to track and trace but you would have expected the numbers to have ticked up in the first few weeks after t&t was introduced, not 9 weeks into the process.There's a number of potential reasons for the increases in cases, which obviously would include the impact of reversing lock-down measures, but it's certainly not as simple as comparing the number of people tested.
The key for me is in the process of 'track and trace' for two reasons 1) That we are testing people in a more targeted way and focused around areas of actual infection and 2) The timing of the testing has a marked difference on the number of positive results and with Track and Trace we are testing more cases at the optimal time.
Interestingly the latest figures from the C19 App shows a reduction in daily cases from 2800 down to 2110 and the number of people interacting with the app significantly outweighs the Goverments limited random testing strategy.
Hope you are correct that increases are due to track and trace but you would have expected the numbers to have ticked up in the first few weeks after t&t was introduced, not 9 weeks into the process.