Joseph

[AllTheBoysAreCheerin']

Exactly so why waste time with yet another one? He’s never going to be the answer

That depends on the question, surely?

 

[tarantula]

...and crap in most of his other appearances.

So, on that point, for the forthcoming campaign, whenever we're due to face what some may consider stiff opposition - i.e. such as Forest last season, as a tactical ploy, perhaps we need to think about taking the temporary measure of planting a smattering of trees on the playing surface at Bloomfield Road on matchday ...

 

[clappers]

I think he will prove all you experts wrong.

It may well have to be at another club….whispers that Critchley has told him he’s surplus to requirements . The all knowing coach supremo obviously thinks he’s crap too

 

[Bend it like Suddick]

When you make reference there to: a team of Critchleys - just to clarify, do you mean a side comprising 11 individual players with the surname 'Critchley' (heaven forbid ...), or do you mean, alternatively, a team assembled, and managed by, our very own managerial maestro, La Critch? If it's the latter, and I can hear Macseasider gnashing his teeth as I type, the reference to Critchley's was missing an important possessive apostrophe - which I've now, dutifully, inserted . I hate to serve as the resident English grammer bore, but, in this instance, with the relevant passage correctly punctuated, any potential confusion is blissfully averted.

(Apologies, in advance, to one of my 'fave' regular contributors)

Sorry I was grammatically inept, thank you for the kind admonishment

 

[S88bfc]

Excellent at Wigan and Oxford? One in four? Not exactly prolific!

If he was prolific he wouldn’t be at Blackpool tbh, he is what he is.